
Waxman Litigation defends companies, boards and executives in federal white-collar investigations and enforcement, and does not act for whistleblowers, relators or claimants against businesses. That is a deliberate position: it means the firm can act for the company without the conflicts that come from also representing people who sue companies. Seth B. Waxman spent 13 years as an Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Columbia, roughly eight of them on fraud and public corruption, before moving into private practice.
If an investigation has just started
The most consequential mistakes are made in the first week, and they are usually about documents and statements rather than about the underlying conduct. Two federal statutes account for most of that exposure:
| Provision | What it reaches | Why it matters immediately |
|---|---|---|
| 18 U.S.C. § 1519 | Altering, destroying or concealing records to impede a federal matter — including in contemplation of one | Up to 20 years. Routine automated deletion continuing after an inquiry begins is the classic exposure |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1001 | False statements in any matter within federal jurisdiction | Applies to statements outside a courtroom and not under oath |
Practical starting points: government subpoenas and investigative demands, search warrants, and internal investigations.
Most matters run on more than one track
A criminal investigation rarely arrives alone. A civil False Claims Act case under 31 U.S.C. § 3729, a regulatory proceeding, and a private civil dispute can all concern the same facts, on different timetables and with different rules, and material produced in one is generally available in the others. That interaction is managed as a single problem: see parallel criminal and civil proceedings.
Company and individuals are not the same client
Their interests can diverge early, and often before anyone notices. Recognizing the point of divergence protects the company, the individuals, and the integrity of any internal review. It is a question to raise at the first meeting.
What did you receive, and what does it actually mean?
Establish which instrument arrived before anything else, because each one carries different obligations, different timing, and a different signal about where the investigation already stands. A search warrant means a judge has found probable cause and the government chose not to ask first; a subpoena means you are being asked to produce. They are not interchangeable, and the correct first response differs.
| What arrived | What it signals | Start here |
|---|---|---|
| Agents at the door with a warrant | A judge has already found probable cause; the government did not ask first | Search warrants at a business |
| A grand jury subpoena | A criminal investigation is under way | Grand jury subpoenas |
| An agency subpoena or civil investigative demand | An agency is investigating, possibly alongside a criminal track | Federal administrative subpoenas and CIDs |
| A state or local subpoena | A non-federal investigation — which can still create federal exposure | State and local subpoenas |
| An agent asking to talk, with nothing in writing | An interview request, and a decision point | Investigators contacted our company — first steps |
| Notice of a parallel civil or regulatory case | Two proceedings, one set of facts | Parallel criminal and civil proceedings |
What do the principal federal white-collar offenses carry?
The longest maximum in a white-collar case is frequently driven not by the underlying conduct but by how the investigation was handled: record destruction under § 1519 carries twenty years, four times the maximum for a false statement. These are statutory maximums, not predictions: an actual sentence is driven by the Guidelines calculation and the facts of the case.
| Provision | Official heading | Maximum term |
|---|---|---|
| 18 U.S.C. § 1341 | Frauds and swindles (mail fraud) | 20 years — 30 if it affects a financial institution or relates to a federally declared disaster |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1343 | Fraud by wire, radio, or television | 20 years — 30 on the same aggravators |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1344 | Bank fraud | 30 years |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1348 | Securities and commodities fraud | 25 years |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1956 | Laundering of monetary instruments | 20 years, and a fine up to $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved, whichever is greater |
| 18 U.S.C. § 201(b) | Bribery of public officials and witnesses | 15 years |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1519 | Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations | 20 years |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1001 | Statements or entries generally | 5 years (8 if terrorism-related) |
How long does the government have to bring a federal charge?
The default is five years, but a decade applies to bank fraud and to wire or mail fraud that affects a financial institution. That difference is one reason a matter can resurface long after a company has assumed it closed, and one reason preservation decisions made early keep mattering for years.
| Offense | Provision | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Most federal offenses, unless another law says otherwise | 18 U.S.C. § 3282(a) | 5 years from commission of the offense |
| Bank fraud (§ 1344) and the related banking offenses listed in the section | 18 U.S.C. § 3293 | 10 years |
| Wire or mail fraud (§§ 1341, 1343) if the offense affects a financial institution | 18 U.S.C. § 3293(2) | 10 years |
| RICO (§ 1963), to the extent the racketeering activity involves bank fraud | 18 U.S.C. § 3293(3) | 10 years |
How this practice is organized
- Subpoenas & Investigative Demands — grand jury, administrative and state process
- Responding to a Federal Investigation — warrants, agent interviews and parallel cases
- Federal Fraud Charges — wire, mail, bank, health care, securities and laundering
- Public Integrity & Corporate Offenses — bribery, false statements, obstruction and computer crime
- Government Contracting Fraud — including False Claims Act defense
Frequently asked questions
Does the firm defend companies or prosecute them?
What is the first thing to do on learning of an investigation?
Does a subpoena mean the company is a target?
Do employees need their own lawyers?
Who is actually forbidden from discussing a grand jury matter?
Why can the same facts be criminal and civil at the same time?
Where can a federal fraud case be prosecuted?
How does a company keep its response from becoming a second case?
What penalties does a federal white-collar conviction carry in fines?
Sources and legal authorities
- 18 U.S.C. § 1001
- 18 U.S.C. § 1519
- 18 U.S.C. § 1512
- 18 U.S.C. § 1505
- 31 U.S.C. § 3729
- Fed. R. Crim. P. 17
- 18 U.S.C. § 1343 — Fraud by wire, radio, or television
- 18 U.S.C. § 1341 — Frauds and swindles
- 18 U.S.C. § 1344 — Bank fraud
- 18 U.S.C. § 1956 — Laundering of monetary instruments
- 18 U.S.C. § 3282 — Offenses not capital
- Fed. R. Crim. P. 6 — The grand jury
- Md. Code, Gen. Prov. § 8–102 — Maryland False Claims Act: prohibited acts and liability
- Va. Code § 8.01-216.3 — Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act: false claims; civil penalty
- Va. Code § 8.01-216.5 — Civil actions filed by private persons
- N.Y. State Fin. Law § 189 — False claims; liability
- United States District Court for the District of Columbia — courthouse
- Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland — courthouse
- United States District Court for the District of Maryland — Greenbelt
- United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia — Alexandria
- United States District Court for the Southern District of New York — courthouse
General information about federal law, not legal advice, and not a prediction of any outcome.
Related: Internal Investigations · Business Litigation · Court-Appointed Receiverships. Call (301) 479-8960 or use the contact page.