Practice Areas
White-Collar Criminal

White Collar Criminal Defense Attorney

ON THIS PAGE

Briefcase on the stone steps of a columned courthouse, illustrating white-collar defense in Washington DC

Waxman Litigation defends companies, boards and executives in federal white-collar investigations and enforcement, and does not act for whistleblowers, relators or claimants against businesses. That is a deliberate position: it means the firm can act for the company without the conflicts that come from also representing people who sue companies. Seth B. Waxman spent 13 years as an Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Columbia, roughly eight of them on fraud and public corruption, before moving into private practice.

If an investigation has just started

The most consequential mistakes are made in the first week, and they are usually about documents and statements rather than about the underlying conduct. Two federal statutes account for most of that exposure:

Provision What it reaches Why it matters immediately
18 U.S.C. § 1519 Altering, destroying or concealing records to impede a federal matter — including in contemplation of one Up to 20 years. Routine automated deletion continuing after an inquiry begins is the classic exposure
18 U.S.C. § 1001 False statements in any matter within federal jurisdiction Applies to statements outside a courtroom and not under oath
Sources: Cornell Legal Information Institute. See False Statements & Obstruction for the full picture.

Practical starting points: government subpoenas and investigative demands, search warrants, and internal investigations.

Most matters run on more than one track

A criminal investigation rarely arrives alone. A civil False Claims Act case under 31 U.S.C. § 3729, a regulatory proceeding, and a private civil dispute can all concern the same facts, on different timetables and with different rules, and material produced in one is generally available in the others. That interaction is managed as a single problem: see parallel criminal and civil proceedings.

Company and individuals are not the same client

Their interests can diverge early, and often before anyone notices. Recognizing the point of divergence protects the company, the individuals, and the integrity of any internal review. It is a question to raise at the first meeting.

What did you receive, and what does it actually mean?

Establish which instrument arrived before anything else, because each one carries different obligations, different timing, and a different signal about where the investigation already stands. A search warrant means a judge has found probable cause and the government chose not to ask first; a subpoena means you are being asked to produce. They are not interchangeable, and the correct first response differs.

What arrived What it signals Start here
Agents at the door with a warrant A judge has already found probable cause; the government did not ask first Search warrants at a business
A grand jury subpoena A criminal investigation is under way Grand jury subpoenas
An agency subpoena or civil investigative demand An agency is investigating, possibly alongside a criminal track Federal administrative subpoenas and CIDs
A state or local subpoena A non-federal investigation — which can still create federal exposure State and local subpoenas
An agent asking to talk, with nothing in writing An interview request, and a decision point Investigators contacted our company — first steps
Notice of a parallel civil or regulatory case Two proceedings, one set of facts Parallel criminal and civil proceedings
Routing guide to this practice’s pages. Each linked page sets out the governing provisions and its own sources.

What do the principal federal white-collar offenses carry?

The longest maximum in a white-collar case is frequently driven not by the underlying conduct but by how the investigation was handled: record destruction under § 1519 carries twenty years, four times the maximum for a false statement. These are statutory maximums, not predictions: an actual sentence is driven by the Guidelines calculation and the facts of the case.

Provision Official heading Maximum term
18 U.S.C. § 1341 Frauds and swindles (mail fraud) 20 years — 30 if it affects a financial institution or relates to a federally declared disaster
18 U.S.C. § 1343 Fraud by wire, radio, or television 20 years — 30 on the same aggravators
18 U.S.C. § 1344 Bank fraud 30 years
18 U.S.C. § 1348 Securities and commodities fraud 25 years
18 U.S.C. § 1956 Laundering of monetary instruments 20 years, and a fine up to $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved, whichever is greater
18 U.S.C. § 201(b) Bribery of public officials and witnesses 15 years
18 U.S.C. § 1519 Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations 20 years
18 U.S.C. § 1001 Statements or entries generally 5 years (8 if terrorism-related)
Sources: 18 U.S.C. §§ 201, 1001, 1341, 1343, 1344, 1348, 1519, 1956, as published by the Cornell Legal Information Institute. Maximums are summarized — read the sections.

How long does the government have to bring a federal charge?

The default is five years, but a decade applies to bank fraud and to wire or mail fraud that affects a financial institution. That difference is one reason a matter can resurface long after a company has assumed it closed, and one reason preservation decisions made early keep mattering for years.

Offense Provision Period
Most federal offenses, unless another law says otherwise 18 U.S.C. § 3282(a) 5 years from commission of the offense
Bank fraud (§ 1344) and the related banking offenses listed in the section 18 U.S.C. § 3293 10 years
Wire or mail fraud (§§ 1341, 1343) if the offense affects a financial institution 18 U.S.C. § 3293(2) 10 years
RICO (§ 1963), to the extent the racketeering activity involves bank fraud 18 U.S.C. § 3293(3) 10 years
Sources: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3282, 3293, as published by the Cornell Legal Information Institute. Limitation questions are fact-specific and subject to tolling — read the sections and take advice.

How this practice is organized

Frequently asked questions

It defends companies and their boards. It does not act for relators, whistleblowers or claimants against businesses.
Stop routine document destruction and take advice before gathering documents or interviewing staff. 18 U.S.C. § 1519 reaches conduct in contemplation of a federal matter.
No. Witnesses, subjects and targets all receive subpoenas. Establishing which the company is tends to be an early priority.
Sometimes, and the answer can change as facts emerge. It is better addressed early than after interviews have begun.
The list is short and closed. It binds grand jurors, interpreters, court reporters, recording-device operators, transcribers, government attorneys and certain people to whom disclosure is made, and no obligation of secrecy may be imposed on anyone else. A witness who receives a subpoena is not on that list. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(2)(A), (B).
Because Congress linked the two. Under 31 U.S.C. § 3731(e) a final federal judgment for the United States in a criminal proceeding charging fraud or false statements estops the defendant from denying the essential elements of the offense in a False Claims Act action arising from the same transaction — so the criminal outcome carries directly into the civil case.
In more districts than most people expect. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3237(a) an offense begun in one district and completed in another may be prosecuted in any district in which it was begun, continued or completed, and an offense involving the mails or interstate commerce is a continuing offense prosecutable in any district from, through or into which that communication moved.
By stopping routine deletion before anything else happens. 18 U.S.C. § 1519 makes it an offense, carrying up to 20 years, to knowingly alter, destroy, conceal, cover up or falsify a record with intent to impede a matter within the jurisdiction of any federal department or agency — or in relation to or contemplation of such a matter.
It depends on who is being sentenced and what was gained. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3571(b)(3) an individual may be fined up to $250,000 for a felony and under § 3571(c)(3) an organization up to $500,000 — but § 3571(d) allows a fine of twice the gross gain or twice the gross loss instead, which in a large fraud is the number that matters.
Contact Info
5425 Wisconsin Ave Ste 600
Chevy Chase, MD 20815
Email Us
Discuss your matter

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Consent(Required)
5.0 out of 5 on Google · 4 reviews · Read the reviews on Google