Waxman Litigation
Experience

Experience & Representative Matters

ON THIS PAGE
For more than 30 years, Seth Waxman has been working as a business litigation attorney both as a trusted adviser to companies, executives, and employees, and as a federal prosecutor. The matters below reflect his work in the areas of business litigation, white collar prosecution and defense, internal investigations, and court-appointed receiverships.
Row of case binders on a shelf, illustrating the firm's representative matters

Key takeaways

Business Litigation

NSYNC Contract Dispute
Role

Counsel for NSYNC

Forum

U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York; Second Circuit

Public source

Mr. Waxman represented the internationally known pop group NSYNC in a breach-of-contract and fraud action filed in New York federal court by the producer of an IMAX film based on the group’s No Strings Attached tour. The producer alleged that the members breached their obligations to support and promote the film through promotional appearances and media interviews. The matter required interpreting complex entertainment and talent agreements and the scope of contractual promotional obligations. The federal trial court in Manhattan dismissed the case before trial, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal.

JPMORGAN CHASE DERIVATIVES CONTRACT DISPUTE
Role

Counsel for Chinese Conglomerate

Forum

U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York

Public source
ISDA Master Agreement; public case details not provided

Mr. Waxman represented a Chinese conglomerate in a breach-of-contract action against JPMorgan Chase in Manhattan. The dispute was governed by the International Swap and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Master Agreement and required interpreting ISDA’s valuation provisions, including the timing of market quotations after termination. The federal trial judge denied JPMorgan’s attempt to dismiss the case, and the case ended in a favorable settlement for his client.

JFK Airport Light Rail Administrative Litigation
Role

Member of Counsel Team for Air Transport Association

Forum

Federal Administrative Litigation

Mr. Waxman was part of a team of attorneys representing the Air Transport Association in a challenge to the Federal Aviation Administration’s approval of $1.2 billion in Passenger Facility Charges to finance an 8-mile light-rail system connecting JFK International Airport to the New York City subway and the Long Island Rail Road. Through the team’s efforts, the court required the FAA to follow the proper administrative procedures in deciding how to fund construction of the project.

NUCLEAR FUEL ADMINISTRATIVE LITIGATION
Role

Member of Counsel Team for Nuclear Utilities and States

Forum

Federal Litigation Against the U.S. Department of Energy

Mr. Waxman was part of a team of attorneys representing a group of nuclear utilities and states against the U.S. Department of Energy for failing to take and store the utilities’ spent nuclear fuel by a Congressionally mandated deadline. Through the team’s efforts, the federal government was ordered to pay the utilities’ costs for continuing to store the spent fuel.

White Collar Defense and Internal Investigations

Flint Water Case
Role

Counsel for State Officials

Forum

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan; Michigan Supreme Court

Public source

Mr. Waxman represented two senior Michigan state government officials in the criminal Flint water case, which arose from the deaths of multiple Flint residents who contracted Legionnaires’ disease after consuming water from the Flint River. Through his efforts, one senior official was never charged, and the criminal case against the other was dismissed before trial. The Michigan Supreme Court affirmed that dismissal.

Congressional Investigation
Role

Counsel for Former Social Security Administration Employee

Forum

U.S. Senate and House Subcommittee Investigations

Mr. Waxman represented a former Social Security Administration employee during Senate and House subcommittee investigations into allegations that the Department of Government Efficiency (“DOGE”) misappropriated and misused Americans’ data in an effort to establish that the 2020 presidential election was stolen. 

Unaoil Bribery Case
Role

Counsel for Alleged “Bag Man”

Forum

International Criminal Investigation

Public source

Mr. Waxman represented an alleged “bag man” in the global bribery case dubbed the “World’s Biggest Bribe Scandal,” involving the Monaco-based company Unaoil. His client was alleged to have delivered $20 million in payments from an Australian company to an Iraqi government official in connection with the award of an oil-pipeline contract valued at approximately $1.4 billion. His client was never charged. 

Stratton Oakmont–Related Securities Fraud (“Wolf of Wall Street” Spinoff)
Role

Counsel for Former Stratton Oakmont Employee

Forum

U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York

Mr. Waxman represented a former employee of Stratton Oakmont, the brokerage made infamous by The Wolf of Wall Street. The employee was charged in Manhattan with securities fraud for a similar penny-stock “pump-and-dump” scheme involving the Walsh Manning and Foster Jeffries brokerage firms. 

State Senator Bribery Investigation
Role

Counsel for State Senator

Forum

U.S. Department of Justice and FBI Investigation

Public source

Mr. Waxman represented a state senator investigated by the Department of Justice and the FBI for allegedly steering government contracts to an associate in exchange for payment. No charges were filed against the state senator. 

Real Estate Investment Adviser Fraud Investigation
Role

Counsel for Investment Adviser

Forum

DOJ and SEC Proceedings

Public source

Mr. Waxman represented an investment adviser that managed more than $600 million in strip malls across the United States and was criminally and civilly charged in parallel DOJ and SEC proceedings with defrauding investors and with a market-manipulation scheme involving WeWork stock. 

Government Contractor: Small-Business Compliance Investigation
Role

Counsel for Government Contractor

Forum

Federal Government Investigation

Public source

Mr. Waxman represented a government contractor with billions of dollars in annual revenue in a government investigation into allegations that the company submitted inaccurate or misleading information about its compliance with federal small-business contracting requirements. Through his efforts, the scope of the investigation was minimized and the company avoided “bet-the-company” risks. 

Government Contractor: Embezzlement Internal Investigation
Role

Counsel for U.S.-Based General Contractor

Forum

Internal Investigation

Public source

Mr. Waxman represented a U.S.-based general contractor with approximately $4 billion in annual revenue in an internal investigation into the embezzlement of more than $1.5 million by an employee. The employee used a sophisticated accounting scheme to divert company funds to pay for personal goods and services in connection with a major microchip manufacturing facility the company was constructing in the Middle East. 

Investment Adviser: Embezzlement Internal Investigation
Role

Counsel for Investment Adviser

Forum

Internal Investigation

Public source

Mr. Waxman represented an investment adviser with billions of dollars under management in an internal investigation into an employee alleged to have embezzled investor funds. Through his efforts, the investigation determined that the employee stole more than $2 million to pay for a wide array of personal goods and services. 

Ammunition Supplier: Accounting Fraud Investigation
Role

Counsel for Ammunition Supplier

Forum

DOJ Investigation

Public source

Mr. Waxman represented an ammunition supplier facing allegations of revenue-recognition fraud. The matter required detailed analysis of complex accounting practices, the underlying commercial transactions and government contracts. Through his efforts, the client was never charged with criminal wrongdoing and minimized its civil exposure. 

Medicaid Billing Company: DOJ/FBI Fraud Investigation
Role

Counsel for Medicaid Billing Company

Forum

DOJ/FBI Investigation

Public source

Mr. Waxman represented a Medicaid billing company in a DOJ/FBI investigation into allegations that it submitted phantom bills and used other allegedly fraudulent billing practices in connection with its special-education reimbursement services. Through his efforts, the company was never charged. 

Hospitality Company: Kickback Internal Investigation
Role

Counsel for Hospitality Company

Forum

Internal Investigation

Public source
Mr. Waxman represented a hospitality company in an internal investigation into allegations that an employee accepted undisclosed payments and other benefits from suppliers in exchange for steering contracts to favored vendors. The investigation concluded that, while the employee violated company policies and procedures, he did not receive illegal kickbacks.

Federal Prosecution Cases

AdSurf Daily Ponzi Scheme (Bowdoin)
Role

Prosecutor (AUSA)

Forum

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida

Public source

Mr. Waxman prosecuted and obtained a guilty plea from a Tallahassee, Florida resident who orchestrated a $120 million online-advertising Ponzi scheme. 

Former Professional Boxer Embezzlement Scheme (Thompson)
Role

Prosecutor (AUSA)

Forum

U.S. District Court, District of Columbia

Mr. Waxman prosecuted and obtained a guilty plea from a former professional boxer who embezzled $200,000 from a youth boxing center he founded and spent the money on personal goods and services, including lavish trips, gambling binges and concerts. 

Delafield Mob Gang and Murder Prosecution 
Role

Lead Counsel

Forum

U.S. District Court, District of Columbia

Mr. Waxman was lead counsel in a four-month-long trial of the Delafield Mob, whose members were charged with 6 murders and 22 attempted murders, including the murder of an innocent bystander who was shot and killed while standing with her two children in front of her house during a drive-by shooting. The jury returned guilty verdicts against all of the gang members, including the gang leader, who received a 109-year prison sentence. 

Independent Oversight and Monitorships

Maryland PTA Receivership
Role

Court Receiver

Forum

Montgomery County Circuit Court, Maryland

A Montgomery County Circuit Court judge appointed Mr. Waxman to take control of the Maryland Parents & Teachers Association’s (“PTA”) finances and operations after allegations that the organization’s president was embezzling money. After a comprehensive internal investigation, Mr. Waxman found that the president had embezzled more than $900,000 in member dues, federal Covid relief funds, and private contributions, using the money to pay for a wide array of personal goods and services, including lavish trips, gambling binges and Voodoo spells. 

These are matters Seth Waxman handled. They are not a promise about outcomes in any future matter, and they are not a complete list of his work, much of which is confidential. Some matters are described generally to protect client confidentiality.

See also: Seth B. Waxman · Business Litigation · White-Collar Defense · Court-Appointed Receiverships. Call (301) 479-8960 or use the contact page.

Contact Info
5425 Wisconsin Ave Ste 600
Chevy Chase, MD 20815
Admissions and credentials
Bar admissions

District of Columbia; Maryland (Bar No. 2607271016); New York (admitted 2005)

Federal practice

Admitted and appears in federal district courts, including on pro hac vice admission. Federal court attorney directories record such admissions; his appears in the Western District of Texas directory under bar number 456156, listed there during his tenure at Dickinson Wright.

Law school

University of Virginia School of Law — Virginia Law Review

Undergraduate

Florida State University, B.S.

Recognition

The Best Lawyers in America — White-Collar Criminal Defense and Commercial Litigation, listed since 2019

 

Bar number 456156 appears as a DDC bar number in his signature block on the ECF No. 57 filing above. Confirm current admission status with the relevant bar.

Email Us
Discuss your matter

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Consent(Required)
5.0 out of 5 on Google · 4 reviews · Read the reviews on Google