
Business litigation is the resolution of disputes between companies, and between a company and the people who own or run it, contracts, ownership and control, fiduciary duties, competition and confidentiality, and the recovery of diverted money. In the District of Columbia most of these cases are heard in the Civil Division of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, with federal matters in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Waxman Litigation acts for companies and their boards, not for the employee or the relator on the other side.
Key takeaways
- Business litigation is the resolution of disputes between companies, and between a company and the people who own or run it, contracts, ownership and control, fiduciary duties, competition and confidentiality, and the recovery of diverted money.
- Some business disputes cannot wait for an ordinary schedule: assets moving, a customer list walking out, a business being locked.
- Seth B. Waxman spent 13 years as an Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Columbia, roughly eight of them on fraud and public corruption, before moving into private practice.
- Most D.C. business claims run on a three-year clock, but three of the deadlines that matter most in commercial disputes are not three years.
- The duty owed depends on the entity, and the District sets a separate standard of conduct for each one, partners, LLC members and managers, and corporate directors are governed by three different sections.
Which side does the firm act for?
The company’s side. That is a deliberate position rather than a marketing line, and it runs through every page below: employer-side in restrictive-covenant and employment disputes, company-side in investigations, and defense-side in False Claims Act matters. It means the firm can act for the business without the conflicts that come from also representing claimants against businesses.
Where are DC business disputes heard?
| Court | Address | What it handles |
|---|---|---|
| Superior Court of the District of Columbia | 500 Indiana Ave NW, Washington, DC 20001 | Civil Division — most DC business disputes, including judicial dissolution and receivership applications |
| E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse | Washington, DC 20001 | Federal claims and diversity matters; federal equity receiverships |
| DC Court of Appeals | 430 E St NW, Washington, DC 20001 | Appeals from the Superior Court |
Court locations verified via Google Places, 2026. Confirm the correct division and filing location before filing.
What claims come up most often?
| Situation | Where the law sits | Page |
|---|---|---|
| An owner is taking money or opportunities | D.C. Code §§ 29–604.07, 29–804.09; §§ 28–3104 to 28–3107 | Breach of fiduciary duty · Diverted funds |
| A departing employee took information | D.C. Uniform Trade Secrets Act, §§ 36–401 to 36–406 | Trade secret misappropriation |
| A restrictive covenant needs testing | Ban on Non-compete Agreements Act, §§ 32–581.01 to 32–581.05 | Non-compete disputes |
| The company needs neutral control | D.C. Code § 29–312.22; § 28–3107(a)(3)(B) | Court-appointed receiverships |
Each linked page quotes the governing sections directly and links to the official text.
What if it is urgent?
Some business disputes cannot wait for an ordinary schedule: assets moving, a customer list walking out, a business being locked. Those are handled as emergency applications for a TRO or preliminary injunction. Note that the Trade Secrets Act allows even threatened misappropriation to be enjoined (D.C. Code § 36–402(a)), and the fraudulent-transfer remedies include an injunction against further disposition (§ 28–3107(a)(3)(A)).
Who handles these matters?
Seth B. Waxman spent 13 years as an Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Columbia, roughly eight of them on fraud and public corruption, before moving into private practice. He is listed in The Best Lawyers in America for Commercial Litigation and White-Collar Criminal Defense.
Past results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future matter.
How long do I have to bring a business claim in the District of Columbia?
Most D.C. business claims run on a three-year clock, but three of the deadlines that matter most in commercial disputes are not three years. Defamation is one year, an instrument under seal is twelve, and a fraudulent transfer has its own rule that can run from discovery rather than from the transfer. The periods below are what the sections say. Which period governs a particular claim, and when the clock started running, are fact-specific questions this page cannot answer. Take advice before relying on any of them.
| Claim | Provision | Period the section states |
|---|---|---|
| Simple contract, express or implied | D.C. Code § 12–301(7) | 3 years |
| A claim for which no limitation is specially prescribed | D.C. Code § 12–301(8) | 3 years |
| Injury to real or personal property | D.C. Code § 12–301(3) | 3 years |
| Libel or slander, including business defamation | D.C. Code § 12–301(4) | 1 year |
| A bond, covenant or other instrument under seal | D.C. Code § 12–301(6) | 12 years |
| Trade secret misappropriation | D.C. Code § 36–406 | 3 years after the misappropriation is discovered or, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have been discovered — a continuing misappropriation is a single claim |
| Fraudulent transfer under § 28–3104(a)(1) | D.C. Code § 28–3109 | 4 years after the transfer was made or the obligation incurred, or, if later, 1 year after discovery |
What duties does D.C. law impose on the people running a business?
| Entity | Provision | Official heading |
|---|---|---|
| Partnership | D.C. Code § 29–604.07 | “General standards of partner’s conduct” |
| Limited liability company | D.C. Code § 29–804.09 | “Standards of conduct for members and managers” |
| Corporation | D.C. Code § 29–306.30 | “Standards of conduct for directors” |
| Any entity — the member’s own claim | D.C. Code § 29–808.01 | “Direct action by member” |
Does the size of the business change the claim?
No. A small business in the District of Columbia has the same claims and the same deadlines as a large one, and its owners answer to the same rules. Most business claims run on a three-year clock, the duty owed depends on the entity rather than on its size, and the emergency remedies for assets moving or an owner locked out are the same. What changes for a small business and its owners is the economics. Each side pays its own legal fees unless something shifts them: a fee clause in the agreement, D.C. Code § 36–404 in a trade secret matter, or § 29–808.06(b), under which a successful LLC derivative plaintiff may be awarded reasonable expenses from the company’s recovery. For a business owner the first question is still whose loss it is: harm to the company itself is pursued derivatively, for an LLC under § 29–808.01, while a loss the owner suffered personally is pursued directly. Waxman Litigation acts for the company’s side, whatever the company’s size.
Business Litigation in Washington, DC
A business dispute in Washington, DC is heard in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia or, when the parties are from different states or a federal claim is involved, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and most business claims must be brought within three years.
The three-year period for a simple contract and for most other business claims is D.C. Code § 12–301; a sale of goods runs four years under § 28:2–725. The duties owed inside the business depend on the entity: partners answer under § 29–604.07, LLC members and managers under § 29–804.09, and corporate directors under § 29–306.30. An LLC member may sue directly in the Superior Court under § 29–808.01, while a shareholder’s claim for harm to the corporation is derivative and needs standing under § 29–305.51. The Superior Court sits at 500 Indiana Avenue NW; the federal court is the E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse at 333 Constitution Avenue NW. The District of Columbia pages in this group go deeper: contract disputes, breach of fiduciary duty, LLC member disputes and shareholder disputes.
Business Litigation in Maryland
Maryland business disputes from Montgomery County are heard in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County in Rockville or in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in Greenbelt, both a short drive from the firm’s Chevy Chase office, and most claims must be filed within three years of the date they accrue.
The general rule is Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5–101: “A civil action at law shall be filed within three years from the date it accrues unless another provision of the Code provides a different period of time within which an action shall be commenced.” Contracts under seal and other specialties have twelve years under § 5–102. Maryland’s partnership act, like the District’s, provides that “the only fiduciary duties a partner owes to the partnership and the other partners are the duty of loyalty and the duty of care” (Corps. & Ass’ns § 9A–404), and § 9A–405 lets the partnership sue a partner for breach of the agreement or of a duty, and a partner enforce the partner’s own rights. A director must act in good faith, in a manner the director reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation, and with the care of an ordinarily prudent person in a like position (§ 2–405.1). An LLC member may bring a derivative action when the members with authority to bring it have refused (§ 4A–801). Any stockholder may inspect the bylaws, minutes, annual statements and voting trust agreements (§ 2–512); stockholders of record holding at least 5% of the shares for at least six months may also inspect the books of account and stock ledger (§ 2–513). A court may dissolve a corporation on the grounds in § 3–413 and appoint a receiver with the powers in § 3–414, including the power to continue the business. A petition to vacate an arbitration award must be filed within 30 days of delivery (§ 3–224). The Circuit Court for Montgomery County is at 50 Maryland Avenue, Rockville; the Greenbelt federal courthouse is at 6500 Cherrywood Lane. Seth B. Waxman is admitted in Maryland.
Northern Virginia Business Disputes
Northern Virginia business disputes are heard in the Fairfax County Circuit Court or, for federal claims and disputes between citizens of different states, in the Eastern District of Virginia’s Alexandria courthouse, and Virginia gives a written contract five years and an unwritten one three. Seth B. Waxman is not admitted in Virginia and appears there only where authorized.
The contract periods are Va. Code § 8.01-246, and § 8.01-230 fixes accrual at the breach rather than at discovery. A Virginia director discharges duties “in accordance with his good faith business judgment of the best interests of the corporation” (§ 13.1-690), and an LLC manager under the same standard (§ 13.1-1024.1). A member who wants to sue on the LLC’s behalf must make a written demand and wait 90 days unless the demand is rejected sooner or delay would cause irreparable injury (§ 13.1-1042). Partners account to the partnership and hold its property and profits as trustee (§ 50-73.102), and § 50-73.103 governs actions by the partnership and by partners. A shareholder may inspect the general records on ten business days’ notice, and the restricted records after holding shares for six months or holding 5% of the votes, for a proper purpose (§ 13.1-771). The circuit court may dissolve a corporation on the grounds in § 13.1-747, including deadlock and oppressive conduct, and may appoint a receiver or custodian under § 13.1-748. Every circuit court may award injunctions (§ 8.01-620), and a temporary injunction runs for the time the court prescribes (§ 8.01-624). An application to vacate an arbitration award must be made within 90 days of delivery (§ 8.01-581.010). The Fairfax County Circuit Court is at 4110 Chain Bridge Road, Fairfax; the Alexandria federal courthouse is at 401 Courthouse Square. This section is general information about Virginia law; Waxman Litigation takes Northern Virginia matters only where its attorney is authorized to appear, including federal court on admission or pro hac vice.
New York Business Litigation
A New York business dispute is heard in the New York State Supreme Court or in federal court, for Manhattan the Southern District of New York at 500 Pearl Street, and a contract claim there may be brought within six years, twice the District’s three. Seth B. Waxman is admitted in New York; the firm has no New York office and handles New York matters from Chevy Chase.
The six-year contract period is CPLR 213(2); some other claims run three years under CPLR 214. A director performs the role “in good faith and with that degree of care which an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances” (Bus. Corp. Law § 717), and an LLC manager under the same words (Ltd. Liab. Co. Law § 409). A shareholder may bring a derivative action under Bus. Corp. Law § 626 and inspect the minutes and shareholder records under § 624; in a dissolution proceeding the corporation or other shareholders may elect within 90 days to buy the petitioner’s shares (§ 1118). A court may dissolve an LLC “whenever it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with the articles of organization or operating agreement” (Ltd. Liab. Co. Law § 702), and a member may inspect the company’s records for a purpose reasonably related to the member’s interest (§ 1102). A partner “must account to the partnership for any benefit, and hold as trustee for it any profits derived by him without the consent of the other partners” (Partnership Law § 43); §§ 62 and 63 set out the causes of dissolution and dissolution by court decree. Parties to a transaction of at least $250,000 may choose New York law whatever their connection to the state (Gen. Oblig. Law § 5-1401). New York has not adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act; trade secret claims there rest on common law and on the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act. See commercial litigation for the arbitration and choice-of-forum rules.
| Jurisdiction | State trial court | Federal court | General limitation period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Washington, DC | Superior Court of the District of Columbia, 500 Indiana Avenue NW | U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, 333 Constitution Avenue NW | 3 years for a simple contract (D.C. Code § 12–301) |
| Maryland (Montgomery County) | Circuit Court for Montgomery County, 50 Maryland Avenue, Rockville | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, 6500 Cherrywood Lane, Greenbelt | 3 years (Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5–101) |
| Northern Virginia | Fairfax County Circuit Court, 4110 Chain Bridge Road, Fairfax | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 401 Courthouse Square, Alexandria | 5 years written contract · 3 years unwritten (Va. Code § 8.01-246) |
| New York | New York State Supreme Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street | 6 years for a contract (CPLR 213(2)) |
Frequently asked questions
Is “commercial litigation” different from “business litigation”?
Does the firm act for employees or whistleblowers?
Where would our case be filed?
How quickly can something be done about assets moving?
Why is the entity form the first question in any business dispute?
How is it decided whether a claim belongs to the owner or to the company?
Who pays the legal fees in a District of Columbia business case?
Can a Maryland LLC member sue another member?
Where are Northern Virginia federal business disputes filed?
Is Seth B. Waxman admitted in New York?
Can a DC LLC member inspect company records?
Sources and legal authorities
- D.C. Code § 12–301 — Limitation of time for bringing actions
- D.C. Code § 28:2–725 — Statute of limitations in contracts for sale
- D.C. Code § 29–604.07 — General standards of partner’s conduct
- D.C. Code § 29–804.09 — Standards of conduct for members and managers
- D.C. Code § 29–306.30 — Standards of conduct for directors
- D.C. Code § 29–808.01 — Direct action by member
- D.C. Code § 29–305.51 — Standing
- D.C. Code § 29–804.10 — Right of members, managers and dissociated members to information
- Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5–101 — Three-year limitation in general
- Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5–102 — Twelve-year limitation; specialties
- Md. Code, Corps. & Ass’ns § 9A–404 — General standards of partner’s conduct
- Md. Code, Corps. & Ass’ns § 9A–405 — Actions by partnership and partners
- Md. Code, Corps. & Ass’ns § 2–405.1 — Standard of care required of directors
- Md. Code, Corps. & Ass’ns § 4A–801 — Derivative actions
- Md. Code, Corps. & Ass’ns § 2–512 — Stockholder inspection of corporate records
- Md. Code, Corps. & Ass’ns § 2–513 — Inspection of books of account and stock ledger
- Md. Code, Corps. & Ass’ns § 3–413 — Involuntary dissolution: grounds
- Md. Code, Corps. & Ass’ns § 3–414 — Receivers
- Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 3–224 — Vacating award
- Va. Code § 8.01-246 — Actions upon contracts
- Va. Code § 8.01-230 — Accrual of right of action
- Va. Code § 13.1-690 — General standards of conduct for director
- Va. Code § 13.1-1024.1 — General standards of conduct for a manager
- Va. Code § 13.1-1042 — Derivative proceedings
- Va. Code § 50-73.102 — General standards of partner’s conduct
- Va. Code § 50-73.103 — Actions by partnership and partners
- Va. Code § 13.1-771 — Inspection of records by shareholders
- Va. Code § 13.1-747 — Judicial dissolution
- Va. Code § 13.1-748 — Receivership or custodianship
- Va. Code § 8.01-620 — Jurisdiction of circuit courts to award injunctions
- Va. Code § 8.01-624 — Temporary injunctions
- Va. Code § 8.01-581.010 — Vacating an award
- N.Y. C.P.L.R. 213 — Actions to be commenced within six years
- N.Y. C.P.L.R. 214 — Actions to be commenced within three years
- N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 717 — Duty of directors
- N.Y. Ltd. Liab. Co. Law § 409 — Duties of managers
- N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 626 — Shareholders’ derivative action
- N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 624 — Books and records; right of inspection
- N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 1118 — Purchase of petitioner’s shares; valuation
- N.Y. Ltd. Liab. Co. Law § 702 — Judicial dissolution
- N.Y. Ltd. Liab. Co. Law § 1102 — Records and information
- N.Y. Partnership Law § 43 — Partner accountable as a fiduciary
- N.Y. Partnership Law § 62 — Causes of dissolution
- N.Y. Partnership Law § 63 — Dissolution by decree of court
- N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 5-1401 — Choice of law
- United States District Court for the District of Columbia — courthouse
- Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland — courthouse
- United States District Court for the District of Maryland — Greenbelt
- Fairfax County Circuit Court — courthouse
- United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia — Alexandria
- United States District Court for the Southern District of New York — courthouse
Discuss a business dispute
-
Call (301) 479-8960 or use the contact page. Related hubs: Internal Investigations · White-Collar Defense & Government Enforcement · Court-Appointed Receiverships.